Sep 13, 2022 8:57 AM
Reluctance to return is more than just the commute
"There is a real difference in psychological safety among work settings," said
The survey found that those working on-site are less likely to feel at ease discussing difficult topics, less likely to feel safe taking risks and less likely to feel that the team respects and values each other. Nearly half (44.5%) of the employees surveyed said they would quit if there was a requirement to work on site without a remote or hybrid option.
A lack of psychological safety at work can have repercussions on a business. Teams where members don't feel comfortable taking a risk to raise a new idea or suggest a new approach will have difficulty innovating. In order for organizations to be successful, its people need to feel comfortable speaking up, asking questions, and disagreeing with team members and managers.
Considering psychological safety across different levels of resilience, the study found that 60% of employees with low resilience and low psychological safety feel burned out and 34% are thinking about quitting their job. Just 5% of highly resilient employees who feel psychologically safe reported feeling burned out and just 3% were thinking about quitting.
"As employers continue to consider how best to structure the workplace, leaders will need to address this very real gap in psychological safety across work settings in order to ensure that innovation, creativity and change-readiness is not compromised in the return to on-site work,"
Methodology: Approximately 3,900 members participated in
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/remote-and-hybrid-workers-have-higher-degree-of-psychological-safety-at-work-than-on-site-employees-says-new-mequilibrium-study-301622935.html